kaal:claim:2992962-014

Even if a state or the federal government passed a law granting a court authority over blockchain smart contract disputes, it is hard to see how the court could in fact exercise that authority short of limiting access to the internet itself.

But even if a given State or even the Federal Government were to pass a law that would grant such authority to a court, it is hard to see how the court would in fact exercise such authority, short of limiting access to the internet itself.

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), a) Anonymity of Blockchain Transactions, p. 36
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

• anonymous parties transacting on public blockchains

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unenforceable-statutory-grantfamily: enforcement-gaplaw-and-legal-systemscompliance

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e19e7975a469b04f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-014.md | sha256sum