kaal:claim:2992962-017

Because smart contracts are coded for computer programming rather than for a human observer, courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract.

Because of the emphasis on code for computer programming (and artificial intelligence), courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract.

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), b) Enforcement of Smart Contracts, p. 39
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

• contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts

failuresupport: arguedfailure: code-not-interpretable-by-courtsfamily: enforcement-gaplaw-and-legal-systemssmart-contracts

• extended_by kaal:claim:5554218-031 The Universal Digital Law Codex should require smart contracts to carry clear, human readable terms alongside ...
• supports kaal:claim:2939127-027 Contract law rules on formation, interpretation, conditions, and remedies require substantive adjustment befor...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/306702c93a07a357...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017.md | sha256sum