Token holders, unlike shareholders in the traditional corporate infrastructure, cannot vote for or against directors or nominate directors, so ordinary ICO investors have no governance channel and simply must trust the promoters and their business intent.
Source quote, verbatim
Further limitations for token holders that amount to significant risk factors include token holders' inability, unlike shareholders in the traditional infrastructure, to vote for or against directors or to nominate directors.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Initial Coin Offerings Emerging Practices, Risk Factors, and Red Flags (2017), IV. Risk Factors, p. 16 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3067615 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Initial Coin Offerings Emerging Practices, Risk Factors, and Red Flags (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3067615
Holds when
typical ICO token structures
ordinary investors as distinct from institutional pre-sale investors
restated_bykaal:claim:3117224-005 Unlike shareholders in traditional corporate structures who can vote for or nominate directors, ICO investors ...
extended_bykaal:claim:3117224-010 ICO investors have no preemptive rights or other anti-dilution protections, so they may be diluted if promoter...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 164ce15b9eb1e8847ebcb073f5b23a96b4974ad0308d77469a9455d4a1ebeb38. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/00374c80c57c47e7...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3067615-019.md | sha256sum