kaal:claim:3125822-010
The chosen expert is deliberately not paid directly out of the fee but only indirectly in newly minted tokens, because the architecture secures itself by making reputation more valuable than any one time payment.
Source quote, verbatim
One counterintuitive element is that the chosen expert is not paid directly in fees, only indirectly in newly minted tokens. The platform was designed to ensure security, and encourage maximal productive cooperation, by valuing reputation over all else.
From
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018), 3.2.4 Contract freedom and fees, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 · source PDF
Cite as
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822
Holds when
Classification
designsupport: arguedreputationrisk-and-incentivesconsensus-and-security
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/41dfed8c4f5722c1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-010.md | sha256sum