kaal:claim:3125822-019

In the absolute worst case, with no safeguards at all, the price of corrupting the platform from within is a minimum of twice the total historical fees added to the system, and instituting any obvious protection raises that price steeply.

in the absolute worst- case scenario, the price to corrupt the system from within is a minimum of twice the total historical fees added to the system. If any obvious protections are instituted, the price to corrupt grows steeply.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018), 4.1.4 Reputation calculation, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822

• worst case assumes any fee is accepted automatically and resolved instantly
• assumes no other users are adding fees

empiricalsupport: arguedconsensus-and-security

• extended_by kaal:claim:3125827-037 Under the worst case model with no admission safeguards and no other users paying fees, a malicious group must...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fc0ee1f1ef3a5e82...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-019.md | sha256sum