kaal:claim:3125827-006

Staking tokens with the potential for slashing is necessary to avoid the tragedy of the commons in a validation pool. Voting without something at risk does not produce honest evaluation of contributions.

Source quote, verbatim

The staking of tokens, with its potential for slashing, is necessary to avoid the tragedy of the commons.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018), 1 Overview, p. 5
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827

Holds when

community voting on the value of contributions
anonymous or pseudonymous participants

Classification

conditionsupport: assertedinstitutional-designreputation

Related claims

restated_by kaal:claim:3782210-014 Reputation must be staked and risked on votes over work evidence, because otherwise the system suffers the Tra...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/15db089eac25d843...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-006.md | sha256sum