kaal:claim:3128900-037

Attack resistance should be designed to increase as the platform grows, in contrast to designs like GEMS that detect and ban malicious actors, because a self enforcement mechanism lets the incentive system steer users away from bad actors once the system matures.

Source quote, verbatim

Unlike GEMS, which bans malicious actors detected through the GEMS trust mechanism from the platform, the Semada platform has a self-enforcement mechanism.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Mechanical Turk Through Verified Reputation (2018), 4 Innovating the Mechanical Turk Market, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128900 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Mechanical Turk Through Verified Reputation (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128900

Holds when

after the system reaches maturity

Classification

designsupport: arguedcomplianceconsensus-and-securitygovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 381d72e85d976e2af852e8ec3bba87bc6a05ccb3349a2c3dd6f9e64de96ab4b0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e3f3b81ffa4f82e6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3128900-037.md | sha256sum