kaal:claim:3227933-035
Fundamental flaws in the DAO's code allowed hackers to transfer one third of the total contributed funds to a subsidiary account, and this together with other technological limitations ended the initiative, but the authors argue it did not end the underlying vision of decentralized autonomous organization.
Source quote, verbatim
To be sure, fundamental flaws in the DAO code made it possible for hackers to transfer one-third of the total contributed funds to a subsidiary account. This, and other technological limitations meant the end of the initiative
From
Cite as
Holds when
Classification
failuresupport: evidencedfailure: DAO code exploitfamily: smart-contract-bug-and-exploitdaogovernance-designblockchain
Related claims
Verify