kaal:claim:3227933-035

Fundamental flaws in the DAO's code allowed hackers to transfer one third of the total contributed funds to a subsidiary account, and this together with other technological limitations ended the initiative, but the authors argue it did not end the underlying vision of decentralized autonomous organization.

Source quote, verbatim
To be sure, fundamental flaws in the DAO code made it possible for hackers to transfer one-third of the total contributed funds to a subsidiary account. This, and other technological limitations meant the end of the initiative
From

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018), 7. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933 · source PDF

Cite as

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Why 'Blockchain' Will Disrupt Corporate Organizations (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227933

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: DAO code exploitfamily: smart-contract-bug-and-exploitdaogovernance-designblockchain

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is a9e9660c4dc25a2202f1da4e762f5885256e05f68c53ca51942f5833a7a4c108. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9ce27ead11a3cc81...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-035.md | sha256sum