kaal:claim:3227967-014

The most important consequence of legal startups is that the legal profession will be forced to innovate in perpetuity, a task that overextended and cumbersome legal organizations which have lost the capacity for rapid re-invention cannot easily accomplish.

Second, and most importantly, the legal profession will be forced by such startup companies to innovate in perpetuity, a task that is not easily accomplished by overextended and – often – cumbersome legal organizations that have lost the capacity for rapid re-invention.

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018), IV. Legal Tech, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967 · source PDF

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967

• incumbent law firms and legal departments facing startup competition

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Incumbent inability to innovate perpetuallyfamily: incumbent-resistance-to-adoptionlaw-and-legal-systemsinnovationinstitutional-design

• restates kaal:claim:2939127-010 Legal Tech startups will force the legal profession to innovate perpetually, a demand that overextended and cu...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3411897-016 RegLegalTech startups will force the legal profession to innovate, but that task is not easily accomplished by...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/7ecc99e333b5dbef...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-014.md | sha256sum