kaal:claim:3249860-025

Seven of the top 100 tokens could not be classified into any token model, with NEM, VeChain, ICON, and Lisk qualifying as outliers with no justification and SUB's whitepaper failing to disclose which model best describes the token.

Source quote, verbatim

Seven tokens were outliers. NEO is a network enabling creation of asset-backed smart contracts.18 NEM, VeChain, ICON, Lisk were outliers with no justification. It was not clear in the whitepaper of SUB what token model type best describes the token.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Crypto Economics - The Top 100 Token Models Compared (2018), IV.4 Token Model Type, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3249860 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Crypto Economics - The Top 100 Token Models Compared (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3249860

Holds when

N=100 dataset
classification based on issuer whitepapers

Classification

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: unclassifiable-token-modelfamily: definitional-ambiguitytokenomicssystemic-risk

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 72b13f11002ba26206cd53e74c324b913d1830c642bfa024da6bac0d3af3a7b0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b44986923ba3d5be...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3249860-025.md | sha256sum