kaal:claim:3266953-031

The Web of Trust is only trustworthy where the service is not valuable, such as essentially free PGP email, because only then is it not worth creating sockpuppet accounts.

So the only time WoT works is when the service is not valuable, such as PGP (email which is essentially free). Then it's not worth it to create sock puppet accounts, so in that case you can trust the WoT network.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018), Sockpuppet Protocol, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

• services with negligible economic value at stake

conditionsupport: arguedfailure: web of trust breaks under economic valuefamily: reputation-system-gamingreputation

• restated_by kaal:claim:3782210-011 The Web of Trust works acceptably for low-value information transmission but should not be used for transactio...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3782210-008 A Web of Trust style reputation ledger, in which each party rates each transaction and reputation is summed wi...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/70c0badbb8a5e935...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-031.md | sha256sum