kaal:claim:3266953-032

In an economic network where real money is at stake, historical good behavior cannot be assumed to prove future good behavior, because sockpuppet accounts allow participants to game the system automatedly, create valuable reputation falsely, and leach value out of the system.

Source quote, verbatim
you can't just assume their historical good behavior will prove their future behavior will also be good. Sockpuppet accounts allow us to automatedly game the system and falsely create valuable reputation, so we can leach whatever value there is out of the system.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018), Sockpuppet Protocol, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: past behavior is not proof of future behaviorfamily: reputation-system-gamingreputationregulatory-failureconsensus-and-securityeconomics

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/bae940ecd75da468...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-032.md | sha256sum