kaal:claim:3441904-039

Community driven audits work in DAOs and rarely in centralized systems because the users of the system typically know best how to assess other members, whereas centralized incentive design does not enable incorruptible internal controls.

The decentralized nature of DAOs enhances efficiency of coordination because the users of the system, e.g. DAO members, typically know best how to assess other users / DAO members.

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019), V.3 Incentive Alignment, p. 35
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904

• DAO governance equipped with an effective incentive design

mechanismsupport: arguedcompliancedao

• supports kaal:claim:3266953-036 The Persona Protocol redistributes power toward people who have no agency in centralized systems, because comm...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e6b562527f7f19accaa35491db0a0db168b6a936755e1dca424e9f30bee7a815. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/7740283a1df3f879...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-039.md | sha256sum

• Agreement: Comparative Analysis of Centralized vs. Decentralized Governance Models for AI-BI in Multi-Cloud Enterprises
• Extension: DAOs unpacked
• Extension: Understanding Members' Active Participation in a DAO: An Empirical Study on Steemit.