kaal:claim:3652481-024

Because consumer protection is a core mandate of any legislature, legislatures are unlikely to surrender control and jurisdiction over a DAO, which would mean no legal recourse and no ability to sue in national courts, while at the same time granting the DAO limited liability.

Because consumer protection is a core mandate for any legislature, it seems less likely that they will surrender control and jurisdiction over the DAO which includes no legal recourse, inability to sue in national courts etc, while also giving the DAO limited liability in that jurisdiction.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020), IV. Governance & Legal Design Experimentation, p. 31
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481

• jurisdictions with a consumer protection mandate

predictivesupport: arguedfailure: consumer protection blocks DAO limited liabilityfamily: legal-personality-and-liability-gaplaw-and-legal-systemsdao

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/42f77c831f26502f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-024.md | sha256sum