kaal:claim:3709041-018

Microdemocratic vote allocation improves outcome quality because a voter's proportional allocation of votes to an issue is itself evidence of that voter's higher knowledge of the issue, and voters are unlikely to give top priority to issues they know little about.

Moreover, part of the power of this microdemocratic approach derives from the higher levels of knowledge a given voter has on a particular issue that is evidenced by the voters' proportional allocation of votes on such issue.

Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020), II.2 Microdemocracy, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3709041 · source PDF

Kaal, Blockchain Technology for Good (2020). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709041

mechanismsupport: arguedcitation-and-knowledgegovernance-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:3808867-015 Microdemocratic vote allocation improves voting outcomes because the proportion of votes a voter allocates to ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 5216a7bca45a48e3bef11ec524936e66af737c0fd66271e9f6866dc20a4482cc. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/d36ece52d8f5ed12...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-018.md | sha256sum