kaal:claim:3782192-010

Unchecked concentration of power drives the distribution toward one member holding nearly all resources, which is clearly inefficient for the goals of the group, and the resulting discontent is the main historical reason for revolt.

In the limit, if left unchecked, the most powerful member would have WXX% of the resources and the others would have X%. Clearly, getting anywhere close to this distribution is inefficient for the goals of the group. The resulting discontent is the main historical reason for revolt.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021), Overview & Introduction: The process of organizational development, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Introduction to Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782192

• hierarchies where the concentration of power is left unchecked

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: Terminal power concentration provoking revoltfamily: recentralization-driftinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7eafd56cb8a8bd15b64cf58216bb655f939bdcc296387e362fd9191976d67ae. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/ea7ece7a0cb3a54a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782192-010.md | sha256sum