kaal:claim:3782193-014

An ideal DAO with open membership for anonymous members from any culture can maintain harmony only if its members share a transcendental value, work toward a common purpose even if that purpose is simply profit, and share fairly in the spoils of the work.

Source quote, verbatim
An ideal DAO has an open membership policy for any anonymous person from any culture on the planet. How can they maintain harmony? They must share a tran- scendental value, work toward a common purpose (even if it's simply profit), and share fairly in the spoils of the work.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021), Prehistory of information technology, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193

Holds when
Classification

designsupport: argueddaogovernance-designblockchain

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c1937bab12b2a225...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-014.md | sha256sum