kaal:claim:3782198-007

If a peer to peer network were decentrally owned by its users, its algorithms could be open source and still remain safe, because the network could reward members for policing exploitation instead of relying on a centralized company to keep the algorithm opaque.

if the P)P network were decentrally owned by the users them- selves, the algorithms can be open source and still remain safe.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), From Social Media to Decentralized Coordination, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

• requires an incentive design that rewards members for defending the algorithm they own

designsupport: arguedopen-source-and-coderisk-and-incentivesgovernance-design

• extended_by kaal:claim:3782201-013 An open source design is necessary to run any program in a peer to peer environment, because decentralization ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/21fccc72be95ca56...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-007.md | sha256sum