kaal:claim:3782198-023

Peer to peer networks scale more favorably than client server architectures because client server costs increase linearly per unit while peer to peer network costs can decrease with each added node, depending on topology.

Network effects proliferate in peer-to-peer networks because, unlike the traditional client- server architecture which is subject to the linearly increasing per-unit costs, the peer- to-peer network costs can decrease with each added node (depending on topology).

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), P-P technology, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

• depends on network topology

mechanismsupport: assertedinstitutional-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:3808852-008 Network effects proliferate in peer-to-peer networks because, unlike client-server architecture with linearly ...
• extended_by kaal:claim:3808859-010 A peer-to-peer computing architecture is more efficient than client-server because client-server carries linea...
• extended_by kaal:claim:3808859-009 Peer-to-peer architecture inverts the role of the audience: higher demand for a file produces more seeding nod...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9f40bb180a139f87...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-023.md | sha256sum