kaal:claim:3782198-030

The GDPR's removal remedy cannot be enforced against a public blockchain: scrubbing private information would require more than half of the network's nodes to change their entire protocol and restart the chain, and would have to be repeated for every violating entry.

Source quote, verbatim
More than half of the network's nodes would be required to change their entire protocol to scrub the data and restart the blockchain. This would need to happen every time information was found on the blockchain which violated the GDPR.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), New tools: blockchain protocols, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unenforceable-erasure-rights-on-chainfamily: enforcement-gaptokenomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f32696d24fbc9a2a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-030.md | sha256sum