kaal:claim:3782198-037

Anonymity should be balanced rather than absolute: a member's power to broadcast should be tied to a pseudonymous account carrying meaningful and valuable reputation that is lost when the broadcasting power is abused.

Source quote, verbatim
Therefore, anonymity should be balanced. Your power to broadcast your voice should be tempered by hav- ing that voice tied with a pseudonymous36 account with meaningful and valuable rep- utation. If you abuse your broadcasting power, then you should lose your reputation.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), Anonymity: pros and cons, p. 35
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

Holds when
Classification

designsupport: arguedreputationrisk-and-incentivesgovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/3f8625edd45e9955...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-037.md | sha256sum