The value of reputation is directly related to how well punishment can be distributed in response to cheating, so a more transparent system produces more accurate and efficient policing and therefore more valuable reputation.
Source quote, verbatim
Another motivation for transparency is that the value of reputation is directly re- lated to how well punishment can be distributed in response to cheating. The more transparent the system, the more accurate and efficient policing can be.
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203
Holds when
systems with reputation based punishment
Classification
mechanismsupport: argueddisclosurereputation
Related claims
extended_bykaal:claim:3981021-035 Punishment for nefarious conduct becomes credible when it is automated, and the value of a voting associate's ...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ab8a22d0dbb026a09212a4c85963f3c05787cf80775e8613ae3724e3883e7a56. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/831c3a98429d0546...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782203-038.md | sha256sum