kaal:claim:3782203-038

The value of reputation is directly related to how well punishment can be distributed in response to cheating, so a more transparent system produces more accurate and efficient policing and therefore more valuable reputation.

Source quote, verbatim

Another motivation for transparency is that the value of reputation is directly re- lated to how well punishment can be distributed in response to cheating. The more transparent the system, the more accurate and efficient policing can be.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021), Application to reputation tokens, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203

Holds when

systems with reputation based punishment

Classification

mechanismsupport: argueddisclosurereputation

Related claims

extended_by kaal:claim:3981021-035 Punishment for nefarious conduct becomes credible when it is automated, and the value of a voting associate's ...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ab8a22d0dbb026a09212a4c85963f3c05787cf80775e8613ae3724e3883e7a56. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/831c3a98429d0546...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782203-038.md | sha256sum