kaal:claim:3782210-016
Newly minted reputation tokens should enter the system neutral, staked half in favor and half against the post that generated the fee, so that existing token holders can judge the action fairly and are not swayed by an unbalanced validation pool created by a large new fee.
Source quote, verbatim
For security, when a reputation token enters the system, it should be neutral, so that one faction is not favored over another. Validation pools should begin fairly. Newly minted reputation tokens should be staked half in favor, half against.
From
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021), Inductive argument for reputation architecture, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210 · source PDF
Cite as
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210
Holds when
Classification
designsupport: arguedtokenomicsconsensus-and-security
Related claims
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cc531ab239f6266c8aeddcc8e54f4c06029c44e825444bee137bbcc0c9d0a8e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b4a3f92eecbc4063...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782210-016.md | sha256sum