kaal:claim:3782210-020

Reputation tokens must have their power limited to their proper domain: for each different expertise there must be a separate type of non-interchangeable reputation token, so that a token carries power only within the DAO whose members hold that specific skill.

Source quote, verbatim

Reputation tokens need to have power limited to their proper domain, meaning that for each different expertise, there is a separate type of non-interchangeable reputa- tion token.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021), Inductive argument for reputation architecture, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210

Holds when

organizations spanning multiple domains of expertise

Classification

conditionsupport: arguedreputationtokenomics

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:3125822-049 Reputation on the platform is domain specific by construction: a separate type of ERC-20 token is minted for e...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cc531ab239f6266c8aeddcc8e54f4c06029c44e825444bee137bbcc0c9d0a8e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/86c32173b90e6570...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782210-020.md | sha256sum