kaal:claim:3782214-032

To preserve the efficiency of a self executing code is law smart contract, the appeals process must be built into the code itself, with triggers either party can engage that freeze the encumbered assets and transfer partial powers of disbursement to a third party arbiter.

Source quote, verbatim

To maintain the efficiency of the self-executing code-is-law smart contract, the appeals process must be built into the code.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021), Judicial short-term governance with hard and soft protocols, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

Holds when

self executing smart contracts hosted by a DAO

Classification

designsupport: arguedlaw-and-legal-systemssmart-contracts

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/53f70502bc83bd40...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-032.md | sha256sum