kaal:claim:3782220-018

A perfectly democratic society would require complete transparency even though most societies draw the line well short of it, so a DAO should specify explicitly where it places the boundary between bureaucratic transparency and secrecy.

Source quote, verbatim

complete and full transparency in every governmental action, but a perfectly democratic society requires complete transparency. This is an abstraction, but a DAO should clearly specify where their values lie, and where they would draw the line between bureaucratic transparency and secrecy.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021), Integrating polar values, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220

Holds when

perfectly democratic ideal treated as the limiting case

Classification

designsupport: argueddisclosuredao

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f1393cd82118f365...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-018.md | sha256sum