kaal:claim:3808852-004

Peer review exacerbates publication bias and can produce a cartelization of knowledge, because non-conforming innovative ideas may not receive full recognition and new findings that threaten existing hierarchies are delayed or denied recognition.

The use of peer reviews can further exacerbate these effects and can result in forms of cartelization of knowledge because non- conforming innovative ideas may not get full recognition.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization and Feedback Effects (2021), II. Decentralization of Science, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808852 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization and Feedback Effects (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808852

failuresupport: arguedfailure: cartelization of knowledgefamily: innovation-chillingcitation-and-knowledgeinstitutional-designinnovation

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 31e91158fdeefebc2f0be54ebf89751f7cdd4c89ecea932888f5ba9be6b1caba. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5f4545da57ea8462...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808852-004.md | sha256sum