kaal:claim:3808859-014

The sharing economy outran its legal frameworks: the legal regimes governing the disrupted industries were often incompatible with the trends the sharing economy generated, forcing cities and municipalities into a proactive regulatory stance.

The legal frameworks that regulate disrupted and associated industries were often incompatible with the emerging trends generated by the sharing economy.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization – Why We Need Technology Infrastructure Upgrades (2021), III.3 Sharing Economy, p. 24
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808859 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization – Why We Need Technology Infrastructure Upgrades (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808859

• applies to ridesharing and homesharing regulation at city and state level

failuresupport: arguedfailure: legacy legal regime incompatibilityfamily: regulatory-lageconomicslaw-and-legal-systems

• extends kaal:claim:3782198-009 The sharing economy requires a reframing of legacy legal regimes, because the legal frameworks regulating disr...
• supports kaal:claim:2939127-011 Legal Tech's disruptive innovation combined with the principles of the sharing economy requires lawyers and la...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 304ad25d43b5ecea3158e3a2ca04e6e1e3bd2958e2134e2dcefbfedf3b6f3ab7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/391d3f0f07e233d0...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808859-014.md | sha256sum