kaal:claim:3931933-001

In conventional Proof of Stake, selection probability for block rewards rises with stake and block rewards are constant regardless of node reputation, whereas in Secure Proof of Stake nodes with higher reputation have a higher probability of being selected for rewards.

In conventional PoS, the nodes with higher stake would have a higher probability of being selected for the block rewards. Block rewards are constant regardless of the node reputation. In SPoS, the nodes with higher reputation have a higher probability of being selected for the rewards.

Wulf A. Kaal, Hybrid Secure Proof of Stake (2021), Consenus Algorithm Experimentation, p. 3
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3931933 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Hybrid Secure Proof of Stake (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3931933

• comparison of conventional PoS and SPoS reward selection

definitionalsupport: assertedconsensus-and-securityreputation

• extended_by kaal:claim:5225296-002 Hybrid Secure Proof of Stake bridges PoS and SPoS by separating block consensus from reward distribution: stak...
• extended_by kaal:claim:5225296-001 An abrupt transition from Proof of Stake to Secure Proof of Stake would destabilize networks built on stake-ba...
• extends kaal:claim:3266953-017 Meaningful and secure reputation tokens supply the incentives needed for secure proof of stake consensus in bl...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55a71cdfceb96fadefba1f2fed9563b588825378c91aff644ee7faaccdf31204. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f5d977ba9a23b298...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3931933-001.md | sha256sum