Misjudging the public commitment portion of a firm underwriting engagement would neutralize the liquidity the DAOIC previously gained through reputation staking.
Source quote, verbatim
Getting the public commitment part on a firm underwriting engagement wrong would neutralize the prior gained liquidity from RNFT staking.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021), II. Basic Concept, 4. Decentralized Underwriting, p. 15 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 04297905564a6092b2db7640561f58fd374d3114c79527357bad09d11b909819. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/995255fa1679bfc7...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3949098-026.md | sha256sum