kaal:claim:3949098-030

Incomplete transparency is deliberately required in phase 2, where the interface discloses only reputation staking outcomes and not the deliberation, so that the DAOIC can experiment with policy adjustments without fear of public market impact.

Source quote, verbatim

This incomplete transparency is needed during phase 2 to ensure the DAOIC can experiment with policy adjustments without fear of public market impact.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021), III. Toy Model, 2. Phase 2 - Capital Allocation, p. 22
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098

Holds when

phase 2, before full transparency is enabled in phase 3

Classification

designsupport: argueddisclosureeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 04297905564a6092b2db7640561f58fd374d3114c79527357bad09d11b909819. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/bd09824c51a18044...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3949098-030.md | sha256sum