kaal:claim:3981021-026

Every CHARITYxDAO decision runs through a two vote model: a loosely coupled sentiment vote with no reputation at stake, followed by a tightly coupled final vote with reputation at stake.

Source quote, verbatim

i. Two vote model a) loosely coupled (sentiment) vote (no reputation at stake), b) tightly coupled (final) vote (reputation at stake):

From

Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021), Governance, Key features, p. 26
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021

Holds when

all CHARITYxDAO governance decisions

Classification

designsupport: assertedreputationgovernance-design

Related claims

extended_by kaal:claim:4067783-018 DAO governance should use a two vote model that distinguishes a loosely coupled vote, where no reputation is a...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9d8bc78d119c780c96c89ce3e820f4ac8b037d39b3ade59feb4e40d46b048288. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/abc9c94b36bfad78...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-026.md | sha256sum