kaal:claim:3995709-005

Proposed remedies for patch size, namely distributing the workload across a broader set of reviewers and providing better transparency on developer review queues, have not solved the problem; patch size remains an issue affecting the quality, speed, and effectiveness of modern code review.

Source quote, verbatim

However, despite the proposed solutions, many commentators recognize that patch size remains to be an issue for modern code review affecting the quality, speed, and effectiveness of the process.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021), Patch Size, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709

Holds when

existing remedies deployed within legacy review processes

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: ineffective patch size remediesfamily: governance-participation-collapseopen-source-and-code

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0c2b801a7c671d1b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-005.md | sha256sum