kaal:claim:3995709-009

Feedback in modern code review is deficient in both timeliness and substance: receiving feedback in a timely manner is developers' number one reported challenge, and the feedback that arrives is often not insightful because reviewers focus on insignificant details rather than larger issues.

Moreover, even when developers finally receive feedback on their code change, it is often not insightful or helpful. For example, the study also found that some reviewers focus on "insignificant details rather than larger issues."43

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021), Lack of Feedback, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709

• surveyed developer populations in industry code review

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: untimely or unhelpful feedbackfamily: collective-action-and-coordination-failureinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/be9e9dbf44c54dd9...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-009.md | sha256sum