A code review should focus on the functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and dangerous code out, rather than on the reviewer imposing their own stylistic logic.
Source quote, verbatim
Instead, a code review should focus on functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and dangerous code out.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021), Lack of Crowd Controls, p. 13 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709
Classification
normativesupport: assertedopen-source-and-code
Related claims
restated_bykaal:claim:4734750-012 A code review should focus on the functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and da...
extended_bykaal:claim:4755632-022 Without crowd control the reviewer's views and the code author's intent are at odds, so a reviewer imposing th...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5ab5966055b9463d...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-017.md | sha256sum