By creating a compendium of reviews, the CRDAO generates common code review standards that legacy code review environments lack, and reviewing under a shared set of standards aligns reviewers and the collective on expectations for functionality and quality outcomes.
Source quote, verbatim
The CRDAO also fills the void left in legacy reviews without common standards. The CRDAO creates a compendium of reviews and through it a common standards for code reviews that are otherwise lacking in legacy code review environments.
Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709
Holds when
a collective reviewing code reviews under a common set of standards
Classification
mechanismsupport: arguedopen-source-and-code
Related claims
restated_bykaal:claim:4734750-027 Aggregating reviews into a public compendium generates a common standard for code reviews that legacy review e...
restated_bykaal:claim:4755632-033 The Code Review Platform fills the void left by legacy reviews conducted without common standards, because a c...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/d0f064d02ab20fc7...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-031.md | sha256sum