kaal:claim:4033886-014

Redemption contracts, the traditional price commitment device for privately issued money, lack credibility, whereas pre programmed smart contracts deliver an enforceable and secure quantity commitment instead.

Source quote, verbatim
Such redemption contracts lack credibility.31 In contrast, the pre-programmed smart contract's enabled by cryptocurrencies facilitate an enforceable and secure quantity commitment.32
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Samuel Evans, Hayley Howe, Digital Asset Valuation (2022), II.2 Impact of Digital Asset Characteristics on Valuation, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4033886 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Samuel Evans, Hayley Howe, Digital Asset Valuation (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4033886

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: non credible redemption contractfamily: valuation-and-pricing-failuresmart-contractsreputationtokenomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 52ba05b1292b1be4bfaf1ee5cf56b14fea9c196d870603e794d7ee316df129bd. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/670375ec1643b7d7...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4033886-014.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim