kaal:claim:4685567-014

Impact 1.0 impact markets fail on the demand side: they have more sellers than buyers, and many potential buyers would have funded those projects anyway, which removes the need for a secondary market and significantly reduces resale value.

Source quote, verbatim
Impact 1.0 markets typically have more sellers than buyers and many potential buyers would have done those 47 projects anyway thus removing the need for a secondary market. This imbalance of high supply and low demand significantly reduces the "resale" value
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024), Social Impact Credits, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Demand Side Collapse in Impact Marketsfamily: liquidity-and-market-structure-failuretokenomicseconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/3841ef78702f9ae4...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-014.md | sha256sum