kaal:claim:4734750-011

Without crowd control, a code reviewer can impose their own logic on the author, forcing repeated rewrites of code whose core functionality is already sound and whose dangerous issues are already controlled for.

Source quote, verbatim
Because the code reviewer may wish to impose their logic on the code author, the code author may be required to rewrite code over and over even though the core functionality of the code is sound and dangerous issues were controlled for.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Single Points of Failure, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Reviewer preference impositionfamily: board-and-oversight-failureinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/98c5f66684329b96...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-011.md | sha256sum