kaal:claim:4734750-013

When the first reviewer misses a defect and follow-on reviewers anchor entirely on the first reviewer's concerns, the review carries a higher risk of inaccuracy; crowd wisdom is one way to correct this myopia and single point of failure.

If the single author of a code review has missed something and the follow-on reviewer focused entirely on the first reviewer's concerns, the code review has a higher risk of lack of accuracy.

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Single Points of Failure, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

• sequential review processes anchored on an initial reviewer

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Reviewer anchoringfamily: board-and-oversight-failureinstitutional-design

• specializes kaal:claim:3782191-026 Centralization has two major flaws that inevitably lead to its downfall; the first is that every centralized o...
• specializes kaal:claim:3782191-022 Centralized coordination enables attack coordination because the hierarchical structure allows attackers to id...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/db922650a2aa5aa0...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-013.md | sha256sum