kaal:claim:4734750-023

Code reviews in legacy firms are often highly subjective, and without crowd controls that subjectivity produces suboptimal review outcomes because no single developer will agree on a given set of code and its intended functionality.

Source quote, verbatim

Code reviews in legacy code review firms are often highly subjective which leads to rather suboptimal outcomes without crowd controls.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Feedback Loops, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

Holds when

reviews conducted without crowd control mechanisms

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Idiosyncratic reviewer preferencefamily: measurement-and-metric-failureinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c032a909a8dca0cb...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-023.md | sha256sum