kaal:claim:4755632-018

Hierarchical review produces an anchoring failure: the first reviewer in the hierarchy gets the highest priority and follow-on reviewers merely add minor upgrades, so adding reviewers does not add the independent scrutiny that would raise code quality.

in the legacy review process, the first reviewer within the hierarchical structure of the code review process often gets the highest priority and is often merely followed with minor upgrades by follow-on reviewers.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024), Market for Code Reviews, p. 34
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632

• applies to legacy hierarchical code review processes

failuresupport: arguedfailure: First Reviewer Anchoringfamily: recentralization-driftopen-source-and-code

• extends kaal:claim:4734750-008 In hierarchical review, the first reviewer's output receives the highest priority and later reviewers add only...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a8fbfbd281e14638...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-018.md | sha256sum