kaal:claim:4755632-021

Legacy code review carries a single point of failure risk: if the single author of a review misses something and the follow-on reviewer focuses entirely on the first reviewer's concerns, the review has a higher risk of inaccuracy, and crowd wisdom is the corrective for that myopia.

Source quote, verbatim

If the single author of a code review has missed something and the follow-on reviewer focused entirely on the first reviewer's concerns, the code review has a higher risk of lack of accuracy. Crowd wisdom is one way to correct possible myopia

From

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024), Single Points of Failure, p. 35
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632

Holds when

applies to standard legacy code review with sequential reviewers

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Reviewer Myopiafamily: board-and-oversight-failureopen-source-and-code

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/81b268782c431572...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-021.md | sha256sum