kaal:claim:4796714-002

Conventional governance methods that are reactive or fixed to ex-post solutions are insufficient for governing technologies whose behavior changes continuously after deployment.

These conventional methods, largely reactive or fixed to ex-post solutions, are proving insufficient for the dynamic nature of AI technologies.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024), Abstract, p. 1
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714

• applies to ex-post regulatory regimes
• holds for AI systems that continue to learn after release

failuresupport: assertedfailure: reactive governance insufficiencyfamily: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gapgovernance-designai-and-agentsdynamic-regulation

• extended_by kaal:claim:4941807-002 Governing AI requires toolsets that simultaneously handle ex-ante governance of models still evolving and ex-p...
• extended_by kaal:claim:4941807-037 Because the WDAG continuously monitors and adjusts to evolving ethical and legal standards, it delivers preven...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6414427b9f987cfa...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-002.md | sha256sum