kaal:claim:4796714-017

Using human judgment to uncover unconscious bias in AI can perpetuate the very biases it is meant to remove, because human reviewers carry their own implicit biases and may lack the expertise to identify bias in complex AI systems.

While human judgment is integral to risk management and bias mitigation, it inherently carries its own biases. Relying on human judgment to uncover unconscious biases in AI may inadvertently perpetuate these biases rather than eliminate them.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024), Challenges, p. 29
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714

• applies to human in the loop bias mitigation programs
• holds where reviewers lack technical expertise or bias awareness

failuresupport: arguedfailure: human oversight bias recursionfamily: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gapinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fdc2be8a9c896e86...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-017.md | sha256sum