kaal:claim:4900878-012

The quantum econophysics models of Baaquie and Ilinski breach the analogy they rely on: without the imaginary unit their formulations cannot produce interference patterns, which are a defining feature of quantum phenomena, so it is doubtful they capture genuinely quantum properties.

For example, in the approaches developed by Baaquie and Ilinski, the absence of the imaginary unit in their formulations implies a lack of interference patterns, which are a key feature of quantum phenomena.

Wulf A. Kaal, Quantum Economy and Tokenomics (2024), 4.1 Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, p. 26
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4900878 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Quantum Economy and Tokenomics (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4900878

• applies to the Baaquie and Ilinski quantum finance formulations

failuresupport: arguedfailure: broken-quantum-analogyfamily: research-design-limitationinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 75bf96d3b751b4ad0a6ca4a32591cf026094f113e3a372aa6c61790941b391f7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fd8f778ec0d6d0c3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4900878-012.md | sha256sum