kaal:claim:4941807-035

Edge weights in the governance graph quantify the relevance, authority, or impact of each precedent or citation, and it is this weighting that steers decision making by surfacing the most pertinent governance pathways.

Source quote, verbatim

system, the weights on the edges could quantify the relevance, authority, or impact of each precedent or citation, guiding the decision-making processes

From

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024), Dynamic Governance, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807

Holds when

where weights are assigned by factors such as recency, jurisdictional relevance, or citation frequency

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedlaw-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designai-and-agents

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:4855607-023 Assigning weights to the edges of a governance WDAG lets the system prioritize some governance elements over o...
extended_by kaal:claim:5886342-042 Retention of rules is governed by a dynamic system of precedent in which a legal principle counts as live only...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ab66c1e99a88da1fa36b0c6b536df5184231fe6aa427f3dd53287a4e0ac79853. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/62009c80a37037ba...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-035.md | sha256sum