kaal:claim:4957318-038

Political resistance to repeal dissolves under the WDAG model because a rule that loses substantial backing simply diminishes in relevance through the citation mechanism, with no external legislative act of repeal to contest.

Source quote, verbatim
dynamically reflecting evolving support or opposition to legal precedents through a citation mechanism. If a legal rule loses substantial backing, its relevance diminishes organically within the WDAG framework, without the need for external legislative intervention.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, The Future of Law - Dynamic Web3 Governance (2024), Dynamic Evolution of Law, Improving Garbage Removal, p. 42
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4957318 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, The Future of Law - Dynamic Web3 Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4957318

Holds when
Classification

mechanismsupport: assertedcitation-and-knowledgeconsensus-and-securitylaw-and-legal-systems

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 137fb77eb82111a85f0ab5581926f762a7414ae84aaf3d56e8299db670e0e0c1. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e0b772e5eaeb6904...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4957318-038.md | sha256sum