Slashing establishes a Nash equilibrium in which rational validators adhere to honest behavior, because the expected cost of penalties exceeds any short-term gain available from misconduct.
Source quote, verbatim
game-theoretic models, which demonstrate that slashing establishes a Nash equilibrium wherein rational validators are incentivized to adhere to honest behavior, as the expected cost of penalties outweighs any potential short-term gains from misconduct
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025), Token Locking and Slashing Mechanisms https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296
Holds when
assumes rational validators who value long-term participation rewards
extended_bykaal:claim:6192998-030 Honest ranking strictly dominates strategic ranking for validators whenever the reputation gain from consensus...
generalizeskaal:claim:6269518-032 Theorem 3b holds that under the integrated solution honest citation is a Nash equilibrium when validators asse...
extended_bykaal:claim:6244278-028 Under persistent reputation and multiplicative updates in the repeated game, honest evaluation is stronger tha...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b2fec675d906334ad67e13b2d97261dc31e38061022867eb3f9ceadd95f4878d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/800977f7d1ea2b1b...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-021.md | sha256sum